Search for: "VIKRAM AMAR"
Results 181 - 200
of 639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2021, 7:24 am
And at Justia’s Verdict, law professor Vikram David Amar has an essay titled “Why the Biden Administration Was Right Earlier This Week to Change Course in the Obamacare Challenge Pending Before the Court. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Immediately prior to taking the position at Illinois in 2015, Amar served as the Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a Professor of Law at the UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm
Faced with a blizzard of illogical, strange, bad-faith arguments coming from Senate Republicans in advance of Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial, one might think that there has to be at least something to their arguments. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 4, 2021, we discussed the First Amendment arguments in the House of Representatives' Managers' trial memorandum. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm
You have to admit, the job is not easy. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The Senate has announced that when it convenes later this month for the second impeachment trial of former President Donald J. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
But legislatures and courts need to understand what the Twenty-Sixth Amendment says and means to prevent this invidious disparate treatment from continuing to affect election outcomes in future years.Follow @prof_amar Vikram David Amar is the Dean and Iwan Foundation Professor of Law at the University of Illinois College of Law on the Urbana-Champaign campus. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Immediately prior to taking the position at Illinois in 2015, Amar served as the Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and a Professor of Law at the UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
What we are witnessing is not a “tantrum. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, we can separate the plausible scenarios from the hot air.The Challenge Is PreposterousRegular Verdict readers will have learned from an outstanding four-part series by Vikram Amar, Evan Caminker, and Jason Mazzone that the challenge to the ACA the Court hears today rests on a truly preposterous chain of reasoning.In 2010, Congress enacted the ACA, a complex law with some interrelated and many unrelated parts. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
Holm.In addition, here on Verdict yesterday, Dean Vikram Amar wrote a brilliant column that—without even relying on Smiley—showed that the term “legislature” in Article II (and, for that matter, in Article I in a related context) does not mean “the legislature acting alone” but “the state’s lawmaking process as a whole. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
With Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat on the Supreme Court now filled, many are taking stock of her judicial legacy. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:16 am
“The Supreme Court Should Stay Out of State Election Law; Allowing federal courts to muck around with state election laws is dangerous and destabilizing”: Law professors Akhil Reed Amar, Vikram David Amar, and Neal Kumar Katyal have this essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:24 am
Illinois law dean and professor Vikram David Amar considers one majority opinion and two dissents by the late Justice that he finds himself most drawn to for Verdict. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
As readers of this series will no doubt recall, in 2012 the Supreme Court in National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
This second installment in our series on the upcoming legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in California v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Here on Verdict alone, readers can find columns by my colleagues Marci Hamilton, Vikram Amar, and Joanna Grossman, while Joseph Margulies offered a helpful suggestion regarding what Justice Ginsburg’s admirers should do now.Because I am a tax law scholar, my take on the Ginsburg legacy is unique. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:11 pm
In an influential 1995 article, Professors Akhil and Vikram Amar argued that the 1947 Presidential Succession Act was unconstitutional. [read post]
