Search for: "Vote v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 9,416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Yale Daily News: Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic filed an amicus brief on Feb. 12 in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
These votes seem much more aligned with the Republican Party’s desire to make it harder for people of color to vote than any reasonable interpretation of the United States Constitution.There is an aspect of equal protection clause doctrine that prohibits states from conditioning the exercise of fundamental rights on payments that the poor cannot afford. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
But bad as we may sincerely, even correctly, believe some of these decisions to be, they are still the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Such laws exist in the United States, however, only because Justice Stephen Field's dissent in The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873) garnered only four votes and not five. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
ALEC also has taken strides in coopting progressives seeking an Article V convention to reverse Citizens United. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
The full 5th Circuit then declined to rehear the case, by an 8-to-8 tie vote. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Such racial cleansings and establishment of “sundown towns” happened across the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
A vote on the final rule is expected by April 2024, with legal challenges likely to follow – the Chamber of Commerce has stated that it will sue the FTC if the rule goes forward. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
”) Florence Kelley didn’t think you had to squint to notice the enduringly unequal status of women in the United States in 1923. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:04 am
Trump-v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:03 am
Among the cases in which the Court denied certiorari on today's order list is South Carolina State Ports Authority v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The directive further specifies that each state has to create a central register of beneficial ownership for companies and imposes that such a register is made accessible to competent authorities, Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs), and obliged entities when taking customer due diligence measures. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:30 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
" This shift followed the substantial and unprecedented government intervention in civic and economic life accompanying the United States' entry into World War I. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Rev. 2135 (2023).ICYMI: "Of Course Presidents Are Officers of the United States," says Mark Graber (The Atlantic). [read post]
