Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 181 - 200 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
The district court granted the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
“[W]here two seemingly conflicting contract provisions reasonably can be reconciled, a court is required to do so and to give both effect"; 2. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan & Anor, heard 12-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  There are differences in personality w/r/t risk, but also differences in situation. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
You can’t be uncertainty averse to both; what matters is relative salience; whether people treat those as losses v. gains, etc.Q: what about people who just decide not to take either risk? [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 12:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Rather the court must interpret the disputed language in context, w with regard to its intended function in the policy. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It is definitely true that norms of fairness matter a lot in authorship, including attribution in many circumstances—but not necessarily in the rigid categories formal law might use. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bone: reason that unfair competition became coextensive w/TM was that there was no longer normative justification for excluding subject matter from TM. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 6:47 am
North's company truck's GPS tracking device indicated that his truck had traveled to a metal recycling facility during working hours, the company became suspicious and commenced an investigation into Mr. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan & Anor, heard 12-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”The court did grant the Beastie Boys leave to add a claim of infringement of an additional, fifth song based on evidence found in discovery, almost 2 years after the case began. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 1:31 pm by Daniel Richardson
  It’s basically the idea that when an insurance company pays their insured and someone else is at fault, the insurance company has a right to collect from the at-fault person. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:38 am by Jim Harper
UPDATE w/additional thought: Democrat Richard Blumenthal, elected to the Senate from Connecticut, is a technophobe demagogue—or plays one on TV, which is what matters. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:34 am by Steve Kalar
   Doesn’t matter, explains the Ninth – this is an objectiveinquiry, not subjective. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
[W]e believe that the holding in Pennsylvania Firecannot be divorced from the outdated jurisprudential assumptions of its era. [read post]