Search for: "WILLIAMS v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS"
Results 181 - 200
of 554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
The U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Sayoc as well,” said U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
In its remand order, the court noted: "The question of whether the Foreign Emoluments Clause, U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
” And moving beyond the courts, oaths might even be beyond the capacity of other members of the legislature to judge: in Bond v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
” Watkins v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
In Kentucky v Dennison, 65 U.S. 66 (1861), the U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
Attorney General William Barr explained the president’s final back-down as forced by timing constraints. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
On July 12, attorneys representing President Trump and the House Committee on Oversight and Reform argued before a three-judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Historically, when challenging actions of Congress or the President (as opposed to state executive officials like prosecutors or civil enforcement officers), a plaintiff has a very high bar to surmount, and that remains the case today. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:50 am
In the case of Kendrick v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
Both of those documents potentially relate to the heart of the contentious litigation over the inclusion of the citizenship question that is now pending before the U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
On May 6, the House Judiciary Committee voted to recommend that Attorney General William Barr be held in contempt of Congress for his refusal to provide the committee with an unredacted version of the special counsel’s report. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
As the Office of the Pardon Attorney reminds us, even a pardon “does not signify innocence. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
Nielsen, the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
§ 600.7(a), this Office accepted OLC’s legal conclusion for the purpose of exercising prosecutorial jurisdiction. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
Another framing focuses on the question of whether Congress has a responsibility to pursue impeachment, conveyed by the portion of the oath members take that requires them to “faithfully discharge the duties of the office. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am
Moreover, entrants waiting in Mexico will experience obstacles in obtaining counsel and fully developing their asylum claims, particularly since the Trump administration has harassed U.S. attorneys who seek to provide legal assistance to this group. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
