Search for: "WOODEN v. WOODEN" Results 181 - 200 of 671
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am by Florian Mueller
And that's what SAS ended up being about more than anything else.The Ginsburg-Breyer style is reflected by their dissenting opinions: the majority's literal reading of the statute in question is deemed "wooden," the statute is allegedly "difficult" (while to Justice Gorsuch and his entire camp its language is crystal clear), the USPTO should have the wiggle room to second-guess lawmakers (it's not just "what" Congress wanted and "why,"… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In his dissent from denial of cert earlier this year in Silvester v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:47 am by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
In the recent case of People v Baugh, decided on February 9, 2018, the First District Court of Appeal in California found that exactly such a bat constitutes a weapon and is illegal to possess under Penal Code Section 22210. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:47 am by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
In the recent case of People v Baugh, decided on February 9, 2018, the First District Court of Appeal in California found that exactly such a bat constitutes a weapon and is illegal to possess under Penal Code Section 22210. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:40 pm by Edward Smith
Vallejo Hit-and-Run Driver Sentenced I’m Ed Smith, a Vallejo personal injury lawyer. [read post]