Search for: "Weiss v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Pruitt, Jones Day, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Broker-dealers, Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Investment advisers, Investor protection, Mutual funds, Reporting regulation, Retail investors, SEC, SEC enforcement FCPA and the Commodity Exchange Act: A New Relationship Posted by David Yeres, David DiBari, and Robert Houck, Clifford Chance US LLP, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Anti-corruption, CFTC, Commodity… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am by Patrick McDonnell
Following a stay and abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; see Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C., 161 AD3d 828, 830; Kliger-Weiss Infosystems, Inc. v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 159 AD3d 683, 684). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Paradis stated that the default rule, set by Supreme Court precedent in Lijeberg v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:56 pm by Inside Privacy
A number of BIPA actions also remain pending in federal and state courts. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:50 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Juror Comprehension of Complex Cases Jennifer Weiss, a law student from St. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Hons obtained their judgment in the New York State Supreme Court, New York County, in an action captioned Hon v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:17 am by SHG
The reason for making the allegation is obvious, as Elliot is likely a public figure and thus held to allege actual malice under Times v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Shana Tabak
Weiss, President, American Society of International Law; and Professor, Georgetown University Law Center Diane  P. [read post]