Search for: "Wells v. Katz" Results 181 - 200 of 806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Moreover, when the Board is indecisive even about deciding such a basic issues as whether a person engaged in case management should be on the presiding panel (which should be avoided at all costs, as is the case in the Federal Court as every experienced Federal Court lawyer knows well), it’s hard to imagine how the Board would be thinking about bringing in the concept of amicus curiae or “assessors” – which would be admittedly unusual but arguably within the realm… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  This is relevant because of the well established principle of damnum absque inuria: harm without legal injury, as when competition decreases profit. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 1:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Conway, a partner with Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, appears to have more of a connection to the second case for argument today: Emulex Corporation v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:42 am by Howard Knopf
David Lametti, as he then was, is available here.3) See Ariel Katz, Access Copyright v. [read post]