Search for: "Wells v. State Bar (1984)" Results 181 - 200 of 617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While none of those cases deal with an Indian nation, Defendants would have this Court apply them by way of analogy: namely, an Indian nation is like the State of Louisiana, the Southampton Fire District, or a Zimbabwe-owned airline and, so, it too should be barred. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
State Bar, 366 U.S. 36, 49 n.10 (1961) (stating that such speech is constitutionally unprotected). 3. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Report: Family Law.Sharbatly v Shagroon [2012] EWCA Civ 1507 (21 November 2012)Appeal against decision that the 'wife' could proceed with an application under Part III MFPA 1984, on the grounds that there had never been a valid marriage. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:24 am by Richard Herz
First, as a district judge ruled in 1984 in a seminal modern-day ATS case, Filártiga v. [read post]