Search for: "Williams v. Barr"
Results 181 - 200
of 288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 3:53 am
Briefly: Sadie Gurman and Jess Bravin report for The Wall Street Journal that “Attorney General William Barr said Monday he expects to find a legal way to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, less than a week after the Justice Department said it would drop the attempt in the wake of a Supreme Court decision blocking it. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 7:50 am
This litigation, Padilla v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm
William Barr, 6/18/19 “Detained migrant children got no toothbrush, no soap, no sleep. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
Two seminal events have occurred in recent days in the ongoing oversight war between the House of Representatives and the Trump administration—and in the ongoing expansion of the doctrine of executive privilege. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
On May 6, the House Judiciary Committee voted to recommend that Attorney General William Barr be held in contempt of Congress for his refusal to provide the committee with an unredacted version of the special counsel’s report. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
On June 3, the government filed a motion to dismiss in the case of Padilla v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
” Mueller owns this judgment call.Indeed, Attorney General William Barr, to whom Mueller ultimately reported, subsequently announced that he disagreed with Mueller’s view. [read post]
30 May 2019, 7:15 am
Barr, concerning the application of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom for yesterday’s session, which included the traditional presentation of Attorney General William Barr to the court. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
In Damus v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
Barr of Virginia. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
In Reed v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
I argued earlier this month that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report misapplied the presidential clear statement rule and improperly exposed many of President Trump’s actions in response to the Russia investigation to potential criminal liability. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
As the confrontation escalates between the House of Representatives and the White House over the production of documents, the appearance of witnesses and compliance with congressional subpoenas, so too have calls for Democrats to initiate impeachment proceedings. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm
It’s U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am
Goldsmith, William Barr (while a private citizen) and others have made the argument that statutes like § 1512, which do not expressly apply to the president, must be construed as not constraining the president if such application would involve a possible conflict with the president’s constitutional prerogatives. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am
(Two other OLC opinions, one written by William Barr in 1989, the other by Ted Olson in 1984, applied the different but related constitutional avoidance canon to read a criminal statute to exclude the president.) [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:00 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am
The current dispute between Democrats in the House of Representatives and Attorney General William Barr could result in contempt proceedings. [read post]
