Search for: "Wills v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 11,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
In a decision handed down on 24 June 2016 (TLT and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 2217 (QB)) Mitting J ordered the Home Office to pay six claimants a combined total of £39,500 for the misuse of private information and breaches of the Data Protection Act (“DPA”) 1998 arising from the publication online of a spreadsheet. [read post]
California Court of Appeal allows plaintiff to bring willful FCRA claims as class action before jury
26 Apr 2022, 6:56 am
In Hebert v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:36 pm
In Masimo Corporation v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:33 am
The jury instruction improperly stated that the plaintiff was required to show willfulness for an award of profits. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:30 am
In Bard v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am
Pennsylvania State Police, 603 Pa. 156, 983 A.2d 627, 637 (2009) (quoting Shambach v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:47 am
The October 30, 2013 Court of Appeals opinion in Ward v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:53 pm
Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
United States (1991). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:29 pm
The plaintiff in the case, entitled Jackson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:58 am
[Estate of Ostlund v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 1:33 pm
The reported decision, Dunn v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 9:32 pm
Rush affirmatively stated she was willing to speak with police without a lawyer; and in doing so, she said nothing to suggest that she thought she had no choice in the matter. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 6:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
In the context of these applications, the fact of and reasons for his arrest were stated in open court. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2006, 11:21 am
In City of Marina v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:39 am
Petersburg to the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
A process account helps explain why Kennedy was willing to invalidate federal law without saying anything, either way, about the constitutional status of state law. [read post]