Search for: "Wolff v. Wolff"
Results 181 - 200
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
Wolff, 2020 WL 2197868 (S.D. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:37 am
See Orr v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:48 am
(citing Wolff v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:06 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
Tzolis v Wolff indicates that the Court is not necessarily opposed to finding new common-law remedies for LLCs so long as not expressly prohibited by statute. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
Liotti, 8395/07;Decided: October 28, 2009; Justice Ute Wolff Lally;NASSAU COUNTY Supreme Court found a middle path. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm
Open micJanis Pilch, Rutgers U: domestically it seems obvious that litigation on 512 can’t change the systemic problem of infringement and the impossibility for most rightsholders to litigate. 512 sets up a permanent conflict b/t service providers and rightsholders. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"*If a regulation controlled, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Wolff v Hodson, 285 N.Y. 197, said that the decision was within the sole power and jurisdiction of the administrative agency and thus no appointee who has obtained permanent appointed to his or her position can be removed without being afforded the procedural rights set forth in §50.4 of the Civil Service Law, "despite the fact that had his [or her] infirmity to qualify for the position been… [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"*If a regulation controlled, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Wolff v Hodson, 285 N.Y. 197, said that the decision was within the sole power and jurisdiction of the administrative agency and thus no appointee who has obtained permanent appointed to his or her position can be removed without being afforded the procedural rights set forth in §50.4 of the Civil Service Law, "despite the fact that had his [or her] infirmity to qualify for the position been… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 6:09 am
In Rozen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
” At Slate (via How Appealing), Josephine Wolff maintains that the court’s recent ruling in Georgia v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:53 am
Wolff, 10 N.Y.3d 100, 105-106, 855 N.Y.S.2d 6, 884 N.E.2d 1005 (2008). [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
Litecoin Foundation Limited v (1) Inshallah Limited (2) Nasjet Limited (3) John Pepin [2021] EWHC 1998 (Ch) (July 2021) Litecoin is a cryptocurrency, promoted and developed by the claimant. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:40 pm
Co. of Midwest v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:48 am
The Edwards Court further reasoned that the fact that the hearing officer was a DMV employee did not invalidate the process, citing the United States Supreme Court’s determination in Wolff v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:25 am
See Tzolis v Wolff, 10 NY3d 100, 108 (2008) (quoting Robinson v Smith, 3 Paige Ch. 222, 232–33 (NY Ch. 1832)). [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
And based on Pfizer's privilige log, the Peter Rost blog has the answer to who those lawyers were: Judith Tytel, Douglas Lankler, Allen Waxman, Jessica Benson, Carlton Wessel, Jaqueline Wolff, George Evans, Margaret Madden, Beth Levine, Ronald Green, Ethan Posner.Funny thing is, Jeff Kindler was General Counsel at the time, so these are all his legal people but he is not copied anywhere on the list below . . . perhaps he didn't want to know? [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
Cort v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:06 am
" United States v. [read post]
