Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
On 15-19 November 2021, the First Tier Tribunal heard submissions in a freedom of information request for the release of Lord and Lady Mountbatten’s papers. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 3:17 am
This UK court of appeal judgment Lord Bishop of Leeds v Dixon Coles & Gill [2021] EWCA Civ 1211 considered whether claims arising from one series of related acts or omissions could be aggregated. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:46 am
That is achieved by interpreting the rules as to competence in the Scotland Act according to the ordinary meaning of the words used. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:30 am
The first thing to point out is that whilst Lord Leggatt was keen to point out that the wording of the GDPR was of no assistance to the court in reaching its decision concerning the old law under the DPA 1998, the reasoning applies in full to the new regime. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am
This argument was founded on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN, which concerned systematic phone hacking by journalists from the Mirror Group. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
Hockridge is accused of using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour and pursuing Watt through Whitehall during an anti-lockdown protect. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
For sex-related speech, the Supreme Court finally abandoned the test in 1957 in Roth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
For sex-related speech, the Supreme Court finally abandoned the test in 1957 in Roth v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:17 pm
There is a question, on the wording of the draft Bill, as to whether a service provider can state that ‘we do nothing about this kind of harmful content’. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am
In relation to the tort gateway issue, Lord Lloyd-Jones (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, and Lord Burrows agree) gave the lead judgment. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Mott MacDonald Ltd v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
A claim in passing off could therefore not be sustained to protect goodwill that any reasonable person would consider to be trivial (Laddie J in Sutherland v V2 Music Ltd, [22]).Wenman claimed that her business was small but profitable, and that she had, since 2010, used the signs in question as descriptors of herself and the services she provided.In light of the evidence and submissions presented, HHJ Clarke was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the columns in Prediction… [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm
In my judgment the reasoning of the House of Lords in Fahia (R v Harrow LBC, ex p Fahia(1998) 1 WLR 1396, HL) provides no basis for that contention, nor did the Court of Appeal in Begum (R. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:11 am
Lord Briggs and Lady Rose recognise that this conclusion may lead to results which at first look counterintuitive and unfair. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:37 am
Also common is the theory that “Gad” is a word people would use so they could swear without taking the Lord’s name in vain. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
In other words, they are pre-conditions that must be met. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:42 am
A Real-Life Appeal, Transcript, and Results – Ayo & Iken A successful appeal by our team member, Jason Coupal, Esquire Transcript Speaker 1: Good morning, the District Court of Appeal of the state of Florida and in for the second district is now in session. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
Doubt was cast upon this practice in early 2021 in a CMC in Sandoz v BMS[7][2021] EWHC 393 (Pat) (Ch) and Teva v BMS where Mellor J observed that the practice of listing the trial before the CMC might well be doing things the wrong way round , and lead to parties jumping the queue to get their trial listed whilst others completed their pre-CMC formalities. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:43 am
Lord Leggatt helpfully noted in his judgement that “in the absence of clear words the parties did not intend to derogate from the normal rights and obligations that a contract would give”. [read post]
