Search for: "Best v. State Bar" Results 1981 - 2000 of 5,423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
  TWO CENTS WORTH CASE & COMMENT SELECTED EXCERPTS IN OTHER NEWS BEST OUTSOURCING & RESEARCH LAWYERS IN THE NEWS   TWO CENTS WORTHJanuary 2018   MORE ON IRS ENFORCEMENT In the last release of King Law Reporter I discussed how so-called tax relief television advertisers are less than candid about the current state of IRS  tax collection. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Firstly, this case endorses best practice in instances where the Defendant to a claim cannot be identified, as established by Warby J in LJY v Persons Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
If we don’t properly support the bench, we risk not attracting the best and the brightest in the bar to take the role. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 12:11 pm
”  So much for relying on states serving as laboratories to identify best practices. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:49 am
”  So much for relying on states serving as laboratories to identify best practices. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:53 am by Schachtman
Harkonen’s lawyer, like much of the plaintiffs’ tort bar, oversold the Supreme Court’s comments about statistical significance, which were at best dicta, and not very well considered or supported dicta, at that. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Such concerns are likely overstated, as Alabama argued in its powerful Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:30 am by Michael Madison
That includes the American Bar Association; regulators in state bars; law school deans; managing partners of law firms; leaders of the bench; corporate chief legal officers and general counsel; insurance carriers; executive directors, presidents, and board chairs of leading nonprofits and NGOs. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:19 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The ICJ also stated that the best remedy for this inappropriate encroachment on the independence and integrity of the judiciary was to publically withdraw the public criticism of McLachlin, or offer an apology for doing so in the first place. [read post]