Search for: "DANIELS v STATE" Results 1981 - 2000 of 5,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2018, 6:50 pm by Jean O'Grady
Shenkman, Senior Manager, KM Counsel & Research, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Patrick V. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 1996, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Daniel J. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
As Professors Elizabeth Rowe and Daniel Mahfood explained in their pre-DTSA article, there were two main challenges when it came to using state trade secret law to reach out-of-state conduct. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
As Professors Elizabeth Rowe and Daniel Mahfood at University of Florida explained in their pre-DTSA article, there were two main challenges when it came to using state trade secret law to reach out-of-state conduct. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
Daniel Byman examined Iran’s foreign policy weaknesses and opportunities to exploit them. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Jane Chong
Imagine the president granted a set of pardons to assist a foreign adversary in waging war against the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]