Search for: "DAY v. USA"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,775
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2011, 11:54 am
Time to start the Labor Day Weekend. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:10 am
Update: USA v Mubayyid, September 1, 2011, 1st Cir. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 9:00 am
That is precisely what happened in a case entitled Mumby v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
Charlie Cray is a research specialist with Greenpeace USA and the director of the Center for Corporate Policy in Washington, DC. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:12 am
Although a professional association not run for profit but for the benefit of its members, BIALL can offer speakers a package which normally includes a contribution to travel expenses, overnight accommodation, attendance at the conference on the day of the presentation, and a modest honorarium. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:54 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Town of Castle Rock v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
Rum production occurs throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, but it has been Cuban rum that has been the subject of decades'-long dispute, and two weeks ago, the subject a Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decision in Pernod Ricard USA LLC v Bacardi USA, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
Arista Records v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
The arbitrator conducted a four-day final evidentiary hearing. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:40 am
USA v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Rebmann v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Rebmann v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Rebmann v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Rebmann v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am
From Meshwerks, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
A bad day for MHL TEK at the CAFC. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Viewed in that context, any thought a consumer might have that the words “Havana Club” indicate the geographic origin of the rum must certainly be dispelled by the plain and explicit statements of geographic origin on the label, according to the court.Survey EvidenceThe trial court properly disregarded the survey evidence as immaterial, because the Lanham Act does not forbid language that reasonable people would have to acknowledge is not false or misleading, the court concluded.The… [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:37 am
The case is USA v Raj Rajaratnam et al, U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:37 am
The case is USA v Raj Rajaratnam et al, U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
One recent example is the case of Ash v. [read post]
