Search for: "DOES 1 through 75" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2011, 10:08 am by Ashwin Sharma
DV visa availability through the very end of FY-2011 cannot be taken for granted. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
75% earned an F, mostly for having no policy at all on marketing to kids. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
Cleary, et al., eds., McCormick on Evidence § 209, at 646 & n.1 (3d ed. 1984)( “In and of itself, statistical analysis can never prove that some factor A causes some outcome B. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
The arbitrator sustained PCTEA position, ruling that the Board, by appointing a Local 264 unit member to the vacancy had:1. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, in principle, only applications pending before the EPO can be European patent applications.The possibility of filing a European patent application not only with the EPO but also with other competent authorities as stipulated by A 75(1)(a) EPC does not change the legal fact that an application filed with one of those authorities is the subject of proceedings according to the EPC before the EPO.[7] From the foregoing it can be concluded that an international… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm by admin
  For the next decade, with the rent increasing only $75 –   Increases of less than 1% a year during an interval when the CPI rose 28%. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:05 am by Kenneth Anderson
It is treating Article 75 of Protocol 1 as legally binding, though it has not been ratified by the Senate. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Certain of our key findings are summarized below: 1. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:24 pm by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
—s. 24, ch. 74-383; s. 14, ch. 75-298; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 1, ch. 88-244; s. 25, ch. 94-134; s. 25, ch. 94-135; s. 1201, ch. 97-102; s. 1, ch. 2000-231; s. 1, ch. 2000-357; s. 157, ch. 2004-5; s. 1, ch. 2005-89; s. 1, ch. 2006-114; s. 1, ch. 2006-115. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:42 am
Below is a summary of Say-On-Pay results through February 21, 2011 based on public filings provided by the respective companies. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:35 am by Broc Romanek
This transaction criterion would be replaced with a new transaction criterion which would allow companies to use Form S-3 or Form F-3 to register primary offerings of non-convertible securities if the company has issued, for cash, more than $1 billion in non-convertible securities, other than common equity, through registered primary offerings over the prior three years and meets the registrant requirements. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
While the appellant has the option to simply take “pot shots” against the examiner’s prima facie case, the examiner cannot create a prima facie case through mere conclusory statements. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:59 pm by Stu Ellis
  Nevertheless, the USDA budget is more than 75% focused on food and nutrition programs, and a diminished amount will be focused on farmers in terms of a safety net. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:10 am by admin
At what point does it get ridiculous and scarcely worth the bother of launching a new product? [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:20 am by velvel
And though the complaint does not detail how or whether information got to the very top of the bank -- to Jamie Dimon, for example, who is discussed extensively in Gillian Tett’s highly regarded “Fool’s Gold” -- it does show relevant processes reaching to a very high level in the bank. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 8:39 pm by Stu Ellis
  1) Does your residual pre-emerge herbicide perform adequately until the post emerge herbicide can be applied? [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
Union of India & Others AIR 1987 SC 1086, this Court observed that Article 32 does not merely confer power on this Court to issue direction, order or writ for the enforcement of fundamental rights. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:00 am by Eoin Daly
Considering that by the terms of Article 75 of the Civil Code: “On the day designated by the parties, the registry office official … will read to the prospective spouses Articles 12, 213 (paras. 1 and 2), 214 (para 1) and 215 (para 1) of this Code. [read post]