Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 8,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
LEXIS 63084, March 20, 2013) and dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaints, holding that Defendants cannot be held liable under RLUIPA for monetary damages and that any request for injunctive relief under RLUIPA is moot because issues relating to the Ramadan meals and vegetarian supplemental snacks were resolved. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:10 pm
G.S. 20-111(1). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Slip op. at 9740-41 & n.1. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Nor does the PTO inquire into whether the famous person also sells the goods or services in question, as it does with private individuals under Section 1052(c). [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:58 am
Op. 93-20 (1993). [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:08 am
Specifically, Pincelli argues: (1) there was not a meeting of the minds; and (2) the email(s) referenced by Plaintiff does not satisfy the statute of frauds. . . . [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:00 am
Appellants filed their revised brief on June 1, 2021 in which they argue that the FTC does not have the authority to impose some of the remedies that the FTC has imposed. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State . . . . [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
Id. at 20, n.4. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am
Sabine River Auth., State of Louisiana, No. 20-40138 c/w No. 22-40433 (5th Cir. 2023). [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:30 am
fl=20- 2277_08302021.mp3. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
COA18-960 Filed: 1 October 2019 Buncombe County, Nos. 16 CRS 2470, 2472 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
” Id. at 20. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
Pseudonymity can also cause difficulties in the fact-finding process, especially as the case gets closer to trial. [1.] [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
"What does "simple CFA" mean? [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 8:54 am
[1] 47 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 8:54 am
[1] 47 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
[1] Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corporation (DC Cir, 8 July 2011) slip op, page 53 (Rogers J) [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 10:51 am
What does your experience suggest? [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
A substantially similar version of this article was initially published in Issue No. 1 2012 of the Business Law News of the California State Bar. [read post]
