Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
" Bruen does not purport to "exhaustively" define how judges may consider similarity. [read post]
5 May 2020, 8:10 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Title 1 D0882736 Faucet handle 2 D0882276 Nonwoven fabric 3 10,637,388 Motor drive with moisture control features 4 10,637,387 Motor control device 5 10,636,583 Material property capacitance sensor 6 10,634,677 Use of acamprosate to modulate ERK1/2 activation in animal models for FXS and ASD and individuals diagnosed with FXS and ASD 7 10,634,659 Test strip ejector for medical device 8 10,634,579 Methods and apparatus for detecting position of a liquid 9 10,634,549 Hospital bed scale… [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm by Bexis
Mindful of this principle, we decline the plaintiffs’ invitation to predict that the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals would adopt the specific provisions of the Restatement advanced by the plaintiffs.Id. at 96 (citing Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
As a key study, Monopolising Local News, has demonstrated: Trinity Mirror, Johnston Press, Newsquest and Tindle own nearly 75% of regional titles. 43% per cent of the 380 Local Authority Districts (LADs) in Scotland, England and Wales are served by a single publisher providing one or more titles, making for a total of 165 local newspaper monopolies. 96% cent of LADs in Scotland, England and Wales have a dominant publisher, accounting for over 50% of the circulation of local papers… [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:41 am by Ron Coleman
 If the manufacturer never, itself, sells the product to the relevant consuming public, however — or if it does so well after the exclusive distributor has built the market and acted as the de facto source of the good — how can the manufacturer claim to be the “source” of the product and beneficiary of consumer goodwill associated with the trademark under which it is sold? [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The result in the appellate court was a split, 2-1 decision that automatically brought the case to the state’s highest court. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
In the UK, JCB had alleged that European Patent (UK) Nos. 1 532 065 B2 (“EP 065”), 2 263 965 B9 (“EP 965”) and 2 616 382 B3 (“EP 382”), and UK Patent No. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:21 pm by Richard Bortnick
Paul Mercury Insurance Co., 347 F.3d 89, 96 (4th Cir. 2003), the Fourth Circuit properly recognized that data, web pages and computer systems do not constitute tangible property because they are not capable of being touched, held or sensed by the human mind. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Barrister and President of Magadelen College, Oxford, Dinah Rose KC, is set to sue the Times for an article which quoted the Bar Standards Board as saying her interpretation of the “cab rank rule” might amount to recklessness, if taken at its highest. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Finally, the court rejected CG’s contention, relying on Article 1(5) of the e-Commerce Directive, that the e-Commerce Directive does not apply to claims under the DPA. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am by INFORRM
Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill does not propose a damages cap or the power to order the publication of an apology. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Events 24 February 2015, “Does Privacy Matter? [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:23 pm
The Convention is now one of the keystones of the European political framework precisely because the execution of each individual judgment in which a state is found to have violated the Convention is closely and systematically monitored by the other states through their representation in the Committee of Ministers.Obligation to comply with judgmentsUnder Article 46 § 1 of the Convention, states "undertake to abide by the final judgment of the Court in any case to which… [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am by Bernard Bell
  Under the statute, as amended in 1942, when the agent of a foreign principal disseminates any “political propaganda,” the agent must: (1) provide the Attorney General with a copy of the material and describe the extent of planned dissemination, (2) provide the recipient of the material with a disclosure statement, and (3) label the material with markings that identify the agent and the agent’s principal.[8] The 1950’s: Oh, We’ve Got Trouble! [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
”  Table 1 summarizes cheeses and cheese types subject to the 60-da [read post]