Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 1981 - 2000 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2019, 1:27 pm
The English Court of Appeal recently issued its judgment in PulseOn Oy v Garmin (Europe) Limited [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Take the example of carriage taxes at issue in the 1796 Supreme Court case of Hylton v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Remember United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
It was a necessary analysis because in English law lateral support is owed to land in its natural state only. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Such agreements have been regarded as enforceable under English Law. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:51 pm
  I have already suggested the arc of this trajectory in American political life, the result of which has been the weakening of the leadership of the two principal political parties in the United States and the rise of mass grassroots organizations (Elite Engagement With Leadership Political Party Organizations: China and the United States Take Different Paths). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
 Although there is no international framework on the requirement of fixation, in English law the work has to be fixed in some material form, such as a film. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by John Elwood
English, 18-292 Issue: Whether a federal prisoner may file a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
Initially placed into a house for single women like Muthana, Begum says she applied to “marry an English-speaking [ISIS] fighter between 20 and 25 years old. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
English, 18-292, Delancy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]