Search for: "Felts v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 5,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
James-Frederick v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:35 am
In New York Times v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:03 pm
One advocate reacted to the filing by stating that he felt like he’d been stabbed in the back. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 10:56 am
C hamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:08 am
Fedda v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 3:57 am
In Wall Transportation, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 3:34 pm
And it continues to happen, especially now that the Supreme Court has sanctioned redistricting reform by commission (in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:29 am
The SPC Blog carries a hot-off-the-press piece from victorious law firm Powell Gilbert following judgment in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Science. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 9:07 pm
By Andrew DelaneyState v. [read post]
American Legion Weighs In on Kingdomware and Asks Federal Circuit to Force VA to Comply with the Law
11 Nov 2013, 8:35 am
The United States. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
However, it is clear that the district court felt that the first court got burned at the TRO stage. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:42 am
I think we all felt. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:30 am
” Gibbons v. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
The Supreme Court, however, felt constricted by the operation of law: Lord Clarke stated that whilst he could see the merits of introducing a public interest exception, “whether and in what circumstances to permit such as exception seems to me to be essentially a matter for Parliament and not for the courts” (see paragraph 49). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm
We are all aware that there is no general entitlement to permanent accommodation via the Part VII route (R v Brent ex p Awua). [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:47 pm
Licensing Inc. v. [read post]