Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog has a round up of this week’s social media news The Hoot has a post entitled “The Crisis in social media: where are we headed? [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 13: Divided TTAB Panel… [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  For those wondering what authorized the police to go through the garbage without a warrant or probable cause, the answer is that the Supreme Court held in California v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:25 am by Russell Jackson
  So many courts -- primarily in California -- have struggled to get around the clear preemption analysis in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:57 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Currently, Szczepanik serves as the Head of the SEC’s Distributed Ledger Technology Working Group, Co-Head of the Dark Web Working Group, and a member of the FinTech Working Group. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– Response to earlier Spicy IP post, considers Danish law (Innovationpartners)   Europe European Commission to commission research into IP systems (IPKat) European Inventor Award 2010 (IPKat) More confusion about EP divisionals (IPKat) Director of DKPTO heading for EPO chair (Innovationpartners) Want to create a mega-research project? [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:38 am
  A delicious example of a brilliant judge taking a close look at a case and dismissing it for not passing muster is Mladenov v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
Now represented by former solicitor general, former head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, and prominent conservative lawyer Ted Olson, the ACLU asks for the justices’ review, arguing that “transparency of the judicial process is central to the rule of law. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
The Volokh Conspiracy has a post on the case, under the heading “Defamation by half truth? [read post]