Search for: "In the Interest of S., John" Results 1981 - 2000 of 32,874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 8:45 pm by Hyman Phelps McNamara
”  Our in-house team brought together many talented HPM attorneys, including Karla Palmer, John Gilbert, Jeff Wasserstein, John Claud, and Kalie Richardson, who gave not only a broad overview of timely and relevant legal, regulatory, and enforcement considerations, but also discussed some interesting, more detailed matters involving the use of telemedicine and telehealth in a post-pandemic environment, and various important DEA and Controlled Substances Act… [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:23 pm by Ilya Somin
It's only briefly mentioned here, as part of a discussion of John Stuart Mill. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
There's the Daily Tattler, which published a story that's negligently false. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am by centerforartlaw
LRB requires interested users to submit their legal name, phone number, Resident Identity Card number, and a short video to the platform for verification purposes. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:05 am by John Floyd
  For example, Chief Justice John Roberts set the tone of the court’s oral arguments by saying, “Since we’re dealing in a case with individual borrowers or would-be borrowers, I think it’s appropriate to consider some of the fairness arguments. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Melissa Stewart
It is building on interest cultivated by the previous effort led by Palau and the Marshall Islands and continued through the work of academics and activists. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Trump’s antics make it more important than it has ever been to reinforce that message. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm by Ilya Somin
In a forceful opinion for the Court, Chief Justice John Roberts denounced this "Catch-22" and emphasized that "[a] property owner has an actionable Fifth Amendment takings claim when the government takes his property without paying for it. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
"[2] It's even more clear that a disclaimer that the statement merely may be inaccurate can't prevent liability. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:06 am by Alan Neff
A civil constitutional system’s sustainability – indeed, its survival – requires a substantial measure of transparency and prevention of conflicts of interest among the system’s most prominent and powerful decision-makers. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:01 am by Berry Law
Federally backed VA home loans are beneficial because they usually have low interest rates and down payment requirements. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
US Lawmakers Resume Globetrotting Paid by Special Interests Yahoo News – Billy House (Bloomberg) | Published: 3/18/2023 Members of Congress and their staffers rebounded from pandemic travel anxiety in 2022, accepting more than $6.6 million worth of airline tickets, hotel rooms, and meals paid for by special-interest groups. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:58 am by Tessa Shepperson
As John Lewis hits troubles in their build to rent scheme will this scheme be more profitable? [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm by Liz Dunshee
” What’s interesting even if you’re not generally following the ins & outs of crypto is that in its 50-page (!) [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Mary Szarkowicz
Fentanyl Trafficking Three Republican Senators–John Barrasso (R-WY), Tim Scott (R-SC), and Hagerty (R-TN)–questioned Secretary Blinken on the Department of State’s activities to combat the trafficking of fentanyl into the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Justin Sherman
John Thune (R-S.D.), along with 10 other senators, introduced the Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology (RESTRICT) Act. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 8:29 am by David Oxenford
  It also raises questions as to how the FCC’s other political rules (e.g., no censorship) should be applied to these authorized ads. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
In General Counsel Memorandum 39862 (Nov. 21, 1991),[30] even indirect or unintentional private benefits can jeopardize a taxpayer’s tax exemption status. [read post]