Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 5,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2007, 7:01 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
Dwyer, LLC, and Sean P. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
The opinion by Chief Justice Roberts (Part III-A, p. 22 of the document above) and the dissenting opinion (Part I-B of the joint opinion by Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Alito and Thomas at p.136) held that the precedents governing the scope and meaning of the Commerce Clause did not permit the reading suggested by the federal government. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
I didn’t copy the P’s work, I copied my own. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
P. 9(b) because the argument was not raised until the reply. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
P. 9(b) because the argument was not raised until the reply. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
B. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:30 am
(See APA Brief at p. 23.) [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:28 am
Stigler, Stephen B. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:18 am
In addition, certain eminent scholars opine (see Raj Bhala p. 276, 277; Roger P. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
"[22] B. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
(b) [“The times specified . [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:25 am
Simultaneously, the U.S. delegation to UNCITRAL also recommended that the UNCITRAL Secretariat conduct a study on possible future work that UNCITRAL might engage in on the subject of ODR for cross-border e-commerce transactions and suggested the Secretariat consider holding a colloquium of experts on the matter. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
N.J.S.A. 2A:34-70a, b. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Does Tax-Adjusting Your Asset Allocation Matter? [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
[Of course all of that precedent came from P-favorable rulings that made it impossible to resolve these cases early.]Rose: 512 applies to broadband and platforms, and those have very different stakes. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:34 am
P. 23(b)(2) - which by its terms is limited to injunctive or corresponding declaratory relief - and, if so, under what circumstances? [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am
In a footnote the court urged the Legislature to expeditiously amend Social Services Law § 384–b (8) to address the concerns it raised. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
Dissenting and concurring opinion, slip op. p. 1. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 11:07 am
With some exceptions, it does not matter to the immigration department that an application for Canadian immigration or Canadian citizenship is represented by someone who is competent. [read post]
