Search for: "MAY v. MAY"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 183,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 1:24 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Arnold, Nugee and Warby) Sandoz Ltd v Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company[2023] EWCA Civ 472 (4 May 2023)This was an appeal by Bristol Myers Squibb Ireland ("BMS") against Mr Justice Meade's judgment in Sandoz Ltd and another v Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland (Unlimited) Company [2022] EWHC 822 (Pat) (7 April 2022) which I [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:05 pm
It appeared in Colored Men and Hombres Aqui, Hernandez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 10:37 pm
The decision in Belsner v Cam Legal Services Ltd [2020] EWHC 2755 (QB) will have sent a shiver down the spine of many claimant solicitors in the personal injury field, although the decision may well have wider implications. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Lord Justice Arnold) Sky Ltd and others v Skykick UK Ltd and another [2020] EWHC 1735 (Ch) (2 July 2020) On 9 May 2020, I wrote in Trade marks - Sky v Skykick, The Final Chapter: "Thus endeth a lawsuit that required three hearings before Lord Justice Arnold as he now is, one to the Court of Appeal and another to the CJEU. [read post]
10 Jun 2025, 8:38 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:27 am
Virginia and Brooke v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:35 am
Hearsay evidence may be the basis for an administrative disciplinary determinationMatter of Hughes v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
22 May 2019, 12:55 pm
(It's Ganal v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm
For another example of what not to do, ElderLawAnswers recently analyzed the case ofJackson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm
For another example of what not to do, ElderLawAnswers recently analyzed the case of Jackson v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:34 am
" Alibaba.com Hong Kong Limited, et. al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:34 pm
Even now email continues to have an "informal" character, business transactions occurring over email thread may, in certain circumstances, create a binding contract. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:16 pm
In the case of Carr v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:55 am
In this context, it may be interesting to see the approach that the UPC (and the English Courts, in some instances) will take with respect to these complicated and interesting issues in the near future. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
However, it could be argued that the beginning of that end may actually date back seven years prior, Méndez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:31 pm
You may recall the Adar v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
In Wicklund v. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
Madigan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 8:30 am
Furthermore, shutting down a communicate-by-text option may circumscribe information flows in ways we can’t anticipate or understand. [read post]
