Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2014, 9:15 am by Daniel Shaviro
 For example, if A uses his capital to build his business, B gives all of her capital away to charity, and C uses his for high-end consumer goods, such as a yacht and a private plane, then the first two are delivering greater value to the society than the third.No surprise that Gates should want to value charitable giving. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
The 50% requirement has a pair of exceptions spelled out in § 1104 (b) and (c), although I’m hard pressed to recall ever seeing a court decision in which either exception was invoked. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:49 pm by Jennifer Williams
After tweeting my sarcastic apology for the terrible ending of the television show LOST, I decided to tweet something a little more serious: a 140-character summary of my conversion story: Sorry I read the Quran to learn abt terrorist beliefs but ended up converting to Islam b/c of what it said. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court also says that imposing failure to warn liability is consistent with the overall purposes of Section 230, which as set forth in sections (c)(1) and (b) encourages self-regulation of offensive content and seeks to protect the free-flow of information via intermediaries. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Turning next to the petition alleging that respondent permanently neglected A and B, the agency must establish that it made diligent efforts to promote and strengthen the parent- child relationship, and that those efforts, through no fault of the agency, failed based on the Social Services Law § 384-b [7], Matter of Gregory B., Matter of George M. and Matter of Melissa DD. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm by Giles Peaker
It was a matter of concern that the notices of variation had disappeared en masse and the only inference the court could reasonably draw from the fruitless search of the files was that the notices had never been served on Mrs M. [read post]