Search for: "McCarthy and McCarthy" Results 1981 - 2000 of 4,989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2016, 3:30 am by Walter Olson
” [Marc Fisher, Washington Post] And: Tyler Cowen on FDR, McCarthy, the politics of the 1930s-50s, and “our authoritarians” versus “their authoritarians. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:22 am by Karen Hoffmann
Filed under: IntLawGrrls, Introducing Tagged: Angie McCarthy, introducing [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am by Ron Coleman
McCarthy’s full bull, at the link. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”The court, Justices McCarthy and Devine dissenting, annulled the Comptroller’s decision and remitted the matter to him “for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 10:57 am by Nikki Siesel
The Board and the Court relied on a general principle of trademark law that “a generic name of goods may also be a generic name of the service of selling or designing those goods” 2 McCarthy §12.23. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 10:57 am by Nikki Siesel
The Board and the Court relied on a general principle of trademark law that “a generic name of goods may also be a generic name of the service of selling or designing those goods” 2 McCarthy §12.23. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
Professor McCarthy responds below to the comments on this TTABlog post regarding his criticism of the TTAB's dilution analysis. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:34 am
McCarthy, Partner, King & Spalding LLP4:45 - 4:50 Closing Remarks. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:36 pm by Linda Holmes
    The Little Book of Movie Law  by Carol Robertson:  KF 4298 .R63 2012 The chapters in this book are called “Reels” and cover everything from the early days of cinema to the silent era to the development of sound to the McCarthy era to the rise of independent producers to obscenity and the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The parties appear to think that abandonment is important because a standard character mark affords a registrant “a broader scope of coverage” compared to a stylized mark (citing McCarthy), even though that doesn’t actually affect the infringement analysis. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
Thomas McCarthy has been a consistent critic of the TTAB's analysis in dilution cases, particularly the Board's failure to properly consider the issue of "impairment" or "damage" arising from the alleged dilution. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 8:56 am
(Although I was fortunate to learn criminal law from a new and then very young Professor Alan Dershowitz.)So I am reluctant to enter the prosecutorial debate between FBI Director James Comey and a former colleague of his, Andrew McCarthy, over just what kind of charges each would recommend be brought (or, in Comey's case, not be brought) against former First Lady, U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Indeed, GOP leader Kevin McCarthy acknowledged they are trying to bring down her presidential bid, and they have effectively lowered her poll numbers–and are still pursuing her. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jan. 30, 1996) (same where affidavit filer didn’t disclose that a challenge had been threatened but not filed); 3 McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Comp. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:50 am by Bill Otis
 But four well-regarded former federal prosecutors  -- Attorney General and Judge Michael Mukasey; former Deputy Attorney General Rudy Giuliani; former Division Chief Andy McCarthy of the USAO for the Southern District of New York; and former Appellate Chief for the Eastern District of Virginia (now Georgetown Law Professor) William Otis have all said that a prosecution could have been brought and probably would have succeeded. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm by John Floyd
McCarthy himself sit up in his grave and pledge allegiance to America all over again. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:21 am
McCarthy, 385 Mass. 160, 430 N.E.2d 1195 (Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts 1982), we recognized a limited exception for when the grand jury `fail[ ] to hear any evidence of criminal activity by the defendant. [read post]