Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 3,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
Bollinger, he said this about black students at the University of Michigan Law School: “The Law School tantalizes unprepared students with the promise of a University of Michigan degree and all of the opportunities that it offers. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
United StatesDocket: 11-770Issue(s): Whether, pursuant to Michigan v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
McDonald, stating that he sometimes disagreed with the Court of Appeals' Adams decision, nevertheless denied the motion.In her appeal currently pending before the Michigan Court of Appeals, Likine relies on a Michigan Supreme Court decision from 1889 which held that statutes cannot criminalize conduct which, through no fault of the defendant, is impossible to avoid. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
McDonald, stating that he sometimes disagreed with the Court of Appeals' Adams decision, nevertheless denied the motion.In her appeal currently pending before the Michigan Court of Appeals, Likine relies on a Michigan Supreme Court decision from 1889 which held that statutes cannot criminalize conduct which, through no fault of the defendant, is impossible to avoid. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm
In Lafler v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:08 am
The Supreme Court of the United States weighed in and held that discrimination on the basis of gender expectations violates the anti-sex discrimination provisions of Title VII. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:12 pm
And it doesn’t matter that many more religions are now represented in the United States than back then. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 1:47 pm
Starr v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
United States, 126 S. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:49 am
[United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
DVD Format/LOGO Licensing Corporation (TTABlog) Why the paperwork is important – District Court E D Michigan judgment in CLT Logistics v River West Brands (Property, intangible) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition to LIFE FOR THE LIVING over LIFE INSURANCE FOR LIVING, rejects genericness and abandonment counterclaims: Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:32 am
Kottschade (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae for Pacific Legal Foundation (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae for Michigan State Bar (in support of petitioners) Docket: 08-765 Title: Virginia v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:13 pm
This question most recently was analyzed by the Western District of Michigan in Howard v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
The case followed another related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
