Search for: "People v. Photo" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2012, 7:25 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
Ranking America's favorite coffees" pjblack.me/L5xNyd /cc @b_arden lol this is really true apparently: "American Heads Are Getting Bigger" pjblack.me/JKKRwz "Family Robbed After Teen Posts Photo of Money on Facebook" pjblack.me/K1kEqd i want an ironing board like this: "E-Board (Easy Board) Ironing Board by Mohsen Jafari Malek" pjblack.me/JKFi11 these are amazing: "Magnificent Macro Photos of Insect Eyes by… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
In June 2011, the Court upheld the Council’s decision and dismissed the gallery owner’s appeal: Tenodi v Blue Mountains City Council [2011] NSWLEC 1183 (21 June 2011). [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 1:35 am by Edward Smith
However, accidents often leave people with fatal injuries. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:47 pm by Jim Walker
             Photo Credits:   Top photo of Ex Priest George Neville Rucker - BishopAccountability.org (Sex Abuse Allegations Against Los Angeles Archdiocese Priests) Bottom photo of M/V Discovery  U.K.'s Mail Online [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 5:01 am by Beatrice Yahia
Frank Thorp V, Sahil Kapur, and Ryan Nobles report for NBC News. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am by Jon
An amendment should specifically overturn Kohl v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 5:48 am
The routes chosen are the obvious ones and can of course be easily faked but should mainly do the job; choosing a digital signature would have been v onerous. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:23 am
 Photo courtesy: Oriental ICThe video presented in this post was downloaded from Douyin. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
The inherent limitations of the test for joint authorship applied by US courts (which look at the specific intent to share authorship, and at customary roles), contribute to 'freezing notions of authorship and discounting the contributions of people who play vital roles in the form and content of the final work but who didn’t write scripts for it'. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:40 am by Afro-Buff
SNAPCHAT has argued that the type of invention relied on is not eligible for patent protection, in terms of the case of Alice v CLS Bank International (a 2014 US Supreme Court decision). [read post]