Search for: "State v. G. N." Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  An arrest is a “seizure” for Fourth Amendment purposes, but under a case called United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm by John Floyd
Osborne that held a state prisoner does not have a due process right to obtain evidence from the state that could establish his actual innocence. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:30 pm by Robert Kreisman
” The appellate court stated that under the standard in the Pedrick case and Maple v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:44 pm
J. 44***Guhan Subramanian, THE EMERGING PROBLEM OF EMBEDDED DEFENSES: LESSONS FROM AIR LINE PILOTS ASS'N, INTERNATIONAL v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
"[G]rowing desperate," id., plaintiff tried to get the defendant to give him the drug through the FDA's "compassionate use" regulations. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]