Search for: "State v. J. P."
Results 1981 - 2000
of 4,861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2015, 4:00 am
Paper records are not affected by the state and use of all the file drawers and boxes used in a paper records system. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
Reply comments stated that DVDs dominate the marketplace. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:37 am
On May 20, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm
Or, to put it slightly more precisely : Rape is the intentional, p*nile penetration of the v*gina, an*s or mouth of another without that person’s consent and without reasonable belief that that person is consenting. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am
Herbert's "negotiable cow" (referred to in Uncommon Law, p.201) can constitute a document.) [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
’ State v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
On the same day Dingemans J handed down judgment in Linton v Tardios ([2015] EWHC 1429 (QB)). [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:07 pm
GUY P. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:07 pm
GUY P. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
GUY P. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:19 pm
Queens Co., 1998) (Milano, J.): Seabrook v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:21 pm
JENNIFER MEDINA, Appellant. 2007-08320 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:09 am
" Ecolab USA, Inc., et al v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:29 am
By Carolyn J. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
J. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
As Oliver LJ pointed out at p 464, Lord Diplock in Erven Warnink at p 744 stated that a plaintiff must have “used the descriptive term long enough on the market in connection with his own goods and have traded successfully enough to have built up a goodwill for his business”, and, as Oliver LJ then observed, this “emphasises the point that goodwill (as opposed to mere reputation) does not exist here apart from a business carried on here”. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
On ‘fend for oneself’, while this might have been useful in the context of R v Waveney DC ex p Bowers [1983] QB 238, 244H, “it is not the statutory test, and at least to some people a person may be vulnerable even though he can fend for himself”. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:20 am
Sean P. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
