Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 45,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 6:18 pm
Today the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in the Microsoft v. i4i case. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) The DC Circuit has just noted on its docket that it has denied rehearing in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 3:42 pm
CEB will present a day-long seminar, "Handling Civil Appeals and Writs in California State Courts," on Friday, October 3, 2008 in Los Angeles and on Friday, October 17, 2008 in San Francisco. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Being on this quest for a long time, it’s all about finding yourself. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:01 am
Here are excerpts: Under the 2012 settlement of Jimmo v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
Even in AT & T v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:44 pm
Long overruled an earlier decision, Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
(Pavlov v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
A landmark 2008 decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
App. 1999); Smith v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:24 am
That possibility exists for as long as a withdrawal agreement concluded between the EU and that Member State has not entered into force or, if no such agreement has been concluded, for as long as the two-year period from the date of the notification of the intention to withdraw from the EU, and any possible extension, has not expired. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm
Wade (1973), Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 11:43 pm
As Ron notes, I'm away and generally off-line for a long weekend. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
