Search for: "State v. Sheets" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2013, 6:35 am by Alex Wohl
The most likely source for the offending quote, if true, was the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision on executive power in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:51 pm by John J. Sullivan
  We even created a cheat sheet of plaintiffs’ many failed attempts. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” Laster then added a note of modesty, with his observation that “to state the obvious, this is the opinion of one trial judge. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 8:37 am by Edelboim Lieberman PLLC
While the specific filing requirements can vary under Subchapter V and certain other provisions of the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Yin’s book and website contain good resources for learning about appropriate (and conscious) language use, including links to style guides from both the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am by John Jascob
By Lene Powell, J.D.In a virtual reunion marking the Dodd-Frank Act’s 10th anniversary, the Act’s chief architects gathered in home offices and living rooms to celebrate successes, reflect on the current economic crisis, and mull remaining areas of reform. [read post]
This analysis represents our best interpretation and recommendations based on where things currently stand.* FOOTNOTES [1] It is unclear as to whether the SBA will publish an Interim Final Rule or update the Frequently Asked Questions fact sheet to expand upon or recognize the October 2, 2020 Procedural Notice. [2] Because it is commonly understood that the issuance of ownership interests does not constitute a transfer of ownership interests, we believe the phrase “sale or other… [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Accordingly, any military action that relies solely on these “inherent” powers should be deemed to violate the Posse Comitatus Act, and should be sustained only if it falls within the president’s “conclusive and preclusive” sphere of authority (per Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]