Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 4,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court denied eight applications for leave to appeal, including: Odom v City of Detroit, No. 142483, where Justices Marilyn Kelly and Hathaway would grant leave; People v Taylor, No. 142390, where Justice Marilyn Kelly would grant leave; People v Kerr, No. 142257, where Justice Marilyn Kelly would grant leave and Justice Zahra did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel; and Spayth v City… [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:14 am
") AC31732 - State v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:58 pm
State, a possession of cocaine case out of Taylor County:Appellant's opening - Stan BrownState's response - Patricia K. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:12 pm
Dodd, 111 Wn.2d 174, 178-79, 759 P.2d 455 (1988); Taylor v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Taylor NG 596/2 51 6/21/22 21-404 United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Taylor NG 596/2 51 6/21/22 21-404 United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:30 am
To determine whether a particular state's crime is a "theft offense," courts engage in a two-step test outlined by the Supreme Court in 1990 in Taylor v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:22 pm
Taylor, 369 B.R. 282, Bankr. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 1:24 pm
Today's published opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Murphy, Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Work of the International Law Commission International DecisionsMaiko Meguro, State of the Netherlands v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:03 am
Drawing on the analytical methodology laid out in several Supreme Court opinions, including Taylor v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
" Employee objected, contending that the collective bargaining agreement [CBA] between the Village and the Bronxville Police Taylor Act Committee [BPTC] provided that he was entitled to individual and family health insurance coverage as a disability retiree. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Establishing seniority rights in the course of collective bargainingBregman v East Ramapo Cent. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:20 am
See Jewelers Vigilance Comm., Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 5:00 am
See Op. at 3-4 citing Taylor v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
