Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 1981 - 2000 of 10,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by jonathanturley
” A 2004 Justice Department study found little support for this cause-and-effect claim. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:07 am by SHG
United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250 (1952). [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am by Susan Klein
Responding to the government’s argument that the Supreme Court has on previous occasions recognized that a sentencing reduction based upon Section 3582(c)(2) is not governed by the constitutional or remedial holding of United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 11:56 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The first issue presented is whether the activities of a ticket agent in the United States can be imputed to state-owned, Austrian rail company OBB Personenverkehr AG (a “foreign state” under FSIA)—to show that the latter engaged in “commercial activity carried on in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlWalter v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Florian Mueller
Little societal value exists in allowing plaintiff to capitalize on more customer data to exploit customer habits. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
Judiciary Law § 510 provides that to be qualified as a juror a person must: (1) be a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the county, (2) be not less than eighteen years of age, (3) not have been convicted of a felony, and (4) be able to understand and communicate in the English language. [read post]