Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am
The Ordinance was challenged by a person acting as an accountant for a temple trust before the Allahabad High Court in B Ram Lal v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The FDA’s M7 Guidance observes that “[s]tandard risk assessments of known carcinogens assume that cancer risk increases as a function of cumulative dose. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Wolf, 443 U. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
See Hamilton v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm
Oman's brief (this post continues below the document): Ralph Oman's Amicus Curiae Brief in Oracle v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm
The international scope of Nazi art looting makes the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Frosh, Bowie knife laws are an important part of his argument, including with a citation to my article Knives and the Second Amendment, 47 U. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:20 am
Texas, 509 U. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:00 am
” In Borden v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
” In contrast, the agency’s previously released strategic plan had described the agency’s mission as promoting “competition” for the benefit of consumers, consistent with the case law’s commitment to protecting consumer welfare, dating at least to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Reiter v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:20 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
My fellow coworkers how do u feel? [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:03 pm
See, e.g., U. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 11:18 am
Let’s start with Diaz v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am
But some of that work was as a consultant to Thurgood Marshall in preparing the Supreme Court case Brown v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:03 am
In other words, while the government contended that it could have obtained the Google data without having sought a warrant, defense counsel argued that the government’s actions implicated Fourth Amendment protections. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am
Finally, the OD agrees with the PP that D120 and D121 were filed with the PP's first reply and supported the PP's line of argumentation in that reply. [read post]
