Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 2001 - 2020 of 9,052
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2007, 10:20 am
Forty years ago, the Supreme Court decided Miranda v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:47 am by Matt Conigliaro
Supreme Court case law but inconsistent with that court’s recent decision in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:18 am by Kelly
You can read what else the Supreme Court has been up to in the tax world here: Taxapalooza at the Supreme Court: Part One (Textron/attorney work product case) Taxapalooza at the Supreme Court: Part Two (Arizona Christian/school tax credit case) Similar Posts: Taxapalooza at the Supreme Court: Part One [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:50 pm by Davin Rosborough
Today, the Supreme Court decided two Arizona voting laws were not racially discriminatory and did not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) in Brnovich v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:23 am by Zach Zagger
The decision closely follows the recent 5-4 Supreme Court [official website] decision issued earlier this week in Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:21 am by Persuasion Strategies
Ken Broda-Bahm: It has been an up and down week for the Obama administration in the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:07 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court won't hesitate to reverse its own precedent to benefit corporations. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:07 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court won't hesitate to reverse its own precedent to benefit corporations. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:57 am by David Brown
"   Lamb also asked Scalia about a perennial issue between them: allowing cameras in the Supreme Court, which Lamb supports but Scalia opposes. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:42 pm
Howard Fischer of The Arizona Daily Star reports that "Tucson Spider-Man web blaster inventor loses to Marvel. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:21 pm
The question presented is: Did the Arizona Supreme Court effectively "overrule" this Court’s bright-line rule in Belton by requiring in each case that the State prove after the fact that those inherent dangers actually existed at the time of the search? [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:21 am by David
In 1995 David M Cantor took a case to the Arizona Supreme Court where his client had decided to stop his car and sleep with the Air Conditioner on. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:56 am by Jon Sands
 In a capital habeas, the 9th examines whether the Arizona Supreme Court's applied a causal nexus between mitigation evidence (mental illness and childhood) and the offense. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:05 pm by Greg Siskind
Judge Bolton's previous ruling will be the subject of a Supreme Court challenge later this spring. [read post]