Search for: "Deputy v. State" Results 2001 - 2020 of 5,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:30 am by WSLL
The deputy stated on direct examination that misstating the date and time was not intentional, but a "cut and paste" error. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Jones, when the relevant online activity is equally accessible nationwide but its content focuses on the forum state and the tortfeasor has knowingly caused the plaintiff to suffer reputational and emotional harm in the forum state, a question left open by the Supreme Court’s decision in Walden v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
  Deputy John McCullough came to her house within an hour and JH showed him “a play list of approximately 25 picture and video files”, which “had pornographic titles that indicated” they “were of underage children. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 10:44 am by Meg Martin
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Meg Martin
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:53 am
But with the deputy attorney general's resignation amid the scandal over the firings of at least eight U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
  The British Museum - filled with IP lawyers and mince piesThe Courts have repeatedly stated that obviousness over the CGK arguments must be "treated with caution" - this phrase is used in many cases. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 3:20 am by Lindsey Meuser Rowland
The PTSD presumption applies to licensed police officers, sheriff’s deputies, state troopers, firefighters, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, corrections officers and others. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 2:57 pm by Will Patton
In Washington, the State Supreme Court arrived at the same conclusion regarding metadata in O’Neill v. [read post]