Search for: "Doe 74"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 3,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2022, 9:47 am
Walker's 74-page ruling granted a preliminary injunction, the judge did not rule on the ultimate question. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
Gilead argued the product described in the SPC is protected by claim 27 of the EP (UK) ‘894 patent, but Teva disputed this and said that the SPC does not comply with Art 3(a) of the SPC Regulation. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:49 am
Here, assuming that Eric’s testamentary bequest had been facially repugnant in the sense that it disinherited Verolin for expressly stated discriminatory reasons, the bequest would nonetheless be valid as reflecting a testator’s intentional, private disposition of his property – the core aspect of testamentary freedom.[74] In these hypothetical circumstances, neither Ontario’s Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
Likewise, when the government is acting in a special role that lets it impose extra speech restrictions—as educator, employer, landlord, regulator of the airwaves, and the like—it may have some extra power to compel speech as well.[27] The question we'll discuss in this Essay will generally be: When does a government action become a speech compulsion subject to serious First Amendment scrutiny, usually akin to the scrutiny applied to similar speech restrictions? [read post]
Do We Finally Have a Canadian Re:Sound Copyright “Fitness Tariff” After 8 Years? “Are We There Yet”?
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm
As Justice John Evans, the dean of administrative law in Canada, stated in the judicial review decision:[74] In the absence of a request from experienced counsel acting for a sophisticated client, fairness did not, in the circumstances of this case, require the Board to disclose copies of the SOCAN agreements on its own motion. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
Likewise, when the government is acting in a special role that lets it impose extra speech restrictions—as educator, employer, landlord, regulator of the airwaves, and the like—it may have some extra power to compel speech as well.[27] The question we'll discuss in this Essay will generally be: When does a government action become a speech compulsion subject to serious First Amendment scrutiny, usually akin to the scrutiny applied to similar speech restrictions? [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:36 am
Lisa F. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:20 am
While the CE is the “HKSAR’s body of power”, the CE is a non-partisan officeholder who does not command a [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 11:43 am
As I put it last Thursday: "I could have an honest discussion with someone about, say, whether servers' tips should be tax-exempt (short answer: they already mostly are), but holy guacamole does that miss the point. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm
Bank of America does not argue on appeal why the deed of trust or the note is not a valid contract. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 am
Does it stand out enough conceptually to consumers? [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
But this sometimes does small justice to the ideologies--the principles and normative frames of reference--from out of which the provisions are conceived and against which they might be judged. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
It is well established that the grant of alicense does not need to be in writing. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 1:47 pm
But the book does much more than that. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:50 am
This post examines an opinion from the Colorado Court of Appeals: People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
Nor does the Agreement allow the AAA to disqualify a party’s appointed arbitrator for partiality, bias, or any other basis. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
That does not cover all scenarios. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
In repeated IQ tests, Smith scored 78, 75, 74, 74, and 72. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:21 am
Those states held 45 of the 74 total electoral votes for all caucus states. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am
Later, in the Federal Register of December 28, 2009 (74 FR 68588), the Commission published a notice that revised the terms of the stay. [read post]
