Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 5,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
Code § 1546(b)(3). [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
-P. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Both forums agreed that in order to approve special assessments for (A) improvements, (B) urgent matters and (C) extraordinary matters only the vote of the majority of the unit owners present in the ordinary meeting is required. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm
(opinion at p. 26). [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:47 am
There is no evidence that the respondent’s intention is to inform the public on matters of public interest.[72] Even if the respondent’s activities could be considered journalistic in part, the exemption under paragraph 4(2)(c) only applies where the information is collected, used or disclosed exclusively for journalistic purposes. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
P. 56(c). [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso: O’Brien v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
The decision arose from an application made under section 14 of PIPEDA which enables a complainant to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, after receiving the Commissioner’s report, to apply to the court for a hearing in respect of any matter in respect of which the complaint was made, or that is referred to in the Commissioner’s report. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
[By guest blogger Paul M. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:27 pm
Congruently, under paragraph (3) of that Article “[p]rotection in the country of origin is governed by domestic law” (and thus not subject to the requirements of the Convention). [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm
B. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 9:51 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
It provides: Where an information society service is provided that consists of the storage of information provided by a recipient of the service, Member States shall ensure that the service provider is not liable for the information stored at the request of a recipient of the service, on condition that: (a) the provider does not have actual knowledge of illegal activity or information and, as regards claims for damages, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or… [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:13 am
P. 50. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:01 pm
The superior court also granted a CR 54(b) certification.West v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
CQG, Inc., January 18, 2017, Newman, P.). [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
Bill B. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 11:05 am
” The Seventh Circuit stated that “[p]ractical considerations support allowing vendors to enclose the full legal terms with their products,” and concluded that “[b]y keeping the computer beyond 30 days, the [buyers] accepted [the seller’s] offer, including the arbitration clause. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 3:27 pm
“Tool Without a Handle: Trustworthy Tools” “’What is truth? [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
” (Slip op. at p. 23) Next, the court considered societal expectations. [read post]
