Search for: "MATTER OF H D"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 3,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
” I’d agree with that. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
Louis School of Law: Social Scientific Research for Lawyers (Andrew D. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Robinette, Peerless Mentor: An Appreciation by George D. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Supp.2d 880, 892-93 (D. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:40 am
I found about this about this case, which involves a product known by virtually every American, by reading this tweet from fellow New York attorney Mark H. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
Further, as a matter of substance, deciding who is to qualify is very different from determining priorities between those who do qualify. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Sept. 7, 2011), upholding the immigration authorities’ reliance on Matter of H, 9 I. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 12:18 pm
H. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:34 am
d. at 639. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:15 pm
H. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
D’Amato, Consumer Confusion and Trademark Infringement, J. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
Moreover, it is insufficient that prior art merely includes separate references to the subject matter of a subsequent patent claim. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:16 am
Widely published on health benefit and other related matters, Ms. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:27 am
Noting that New York’s highest court never has addressed the issue, the court adopted the “no-burden” approach proposed by the parties and supported by former Justice Stephen Crane’s analysis in Matter of Cohen, 168 Misc 2d 91 [Sup Ct, NY County 1995], aff’d, 240 AD2d 225 [1st Dept 1997], under which, as Justice Kornreich put it, “the court will consider the parties’ expert testimony as persuasive evidence of fair value, but, at the end of… [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm
Nevertheless, with a view to the overall public interest in reasonable IP enforcement, I concur with the Internet Assocation's amicus brief and hope that circuit judges with a particularly balanced approach will have a majority on the panel hearing this incredibly important appeal.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on… [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
I thought I’d pass along an excerpt of an interesting case that was just posted on Westlaw, Matter of P.P. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
(quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts §911, comment h (1977)). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
Fraud;h. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 11:50 am
That heightened standard was subsequently extended to cases involving waivers under section 212(h) of the Act by regulation, see 8 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 11:50 am
That heightened standard was subsequently extended to cases involving waivers under section 212(h) of the Act by regulation, see 8 C.F.R. [read post]
