Search for: "Matter of Will of Smith"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 10,928
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
My views on Smith are no secret; Justice Scalia called me Smith's most prominent academic critic. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:32 am
I don’t know a single housing lawyer, no matter who they act for, who thinks this is lawful. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
So as not to make this post overly long, I'll assume familiarity with my post from yesterday, where I discuss some of these matters in greater detail.Is Philadelphia's Nondiscrimination Condition Generally Applicable? [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:24 pm
I don’t know a single housing lawyer, no matter who they act for, who thinks this is lawful. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
Third, we got an early glimpse of how Justice Barrett views stare decisis, Smith, and Sherbert. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:02 pm
Smith, neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm
What Smith requires, Fisher explains, is actual “disparate treatment” of religion. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:09 pm
In some criminal matters, even a defendant that admits to committing the allegedly criminal acts may be found not guilty if a valid justification for the behavior exists. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am
“You didn’t indicate in your notes, Officer Smith, that my client had any problems producing license or registration. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Smith is an attorney with Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne P.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
This delegation of the Commonwealth agency’s family-approval function is not simply a matter of Pennsylvania abdicating its responsibility to perform its own duty by turning it over to private parties to do what they wish. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:20 am
In Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
Review on a writ of certiorari is not a matter of right, but of judicial discretion. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 2:40 pm
Consider Jason Smith of Missouri, who was sworn into Congress less than 18 hours after the polls closed in 2013. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:19 pm
As a legal matter, what happens if the Supreme Court overturns Smith? [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
(Boundy.2018.BadGuidance) Colleen Chien and Jiun-Ying Wu, Decoding Patentable Subject Matter, 2018 PatentlyO Patent Law Journal 1. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:10 am
Nor does it matter that the injury comes from a third party (here, Baker), so long as the third party's conduct is foreseeable. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
This may be true both in terms of subject matter, but also in terms of volume. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:08 am
Here is the opinion in Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 1:42 pm
It obviously may not matter if the Supreme Court chooses to reaffirm Smith. [read post]
