Search for: "People v Jones" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2021, 11:22 am by admin
Prescriptively, we can, and should, hold people to higher standards. [read post]
Eleven years later, the Court decided a case in which the reason for the racial discrimination was religious in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm by Evelyn Douek
The bylaws state that “in the future” people will be able to appeal to the board in matters relating to a broad range of content types, including groups, pages and—perhaps most significantly, given the constant ongoing controversy—advertisements. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
If that seems as familiar as Indiana Jones 4, that very question is already before the court in a number of serial relists: Allen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
Nonetheless, Judge Jones, in his published decision, clearly rejected all the plaintiffs’ witnesses and affiants, including Egilman, in their efforts to make a case for silicone as a cause of autoimmune disease. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
They can vote and do what they want to do, that group of people. [read post]