Search for: "Smith v. Day"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 4,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
Brennan — time limit for a federal employee to file a workplace grievance claiming constructive discharge from the job Tuesday, December 1: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
| IP: When innovation is the answer to a spiritual funkNever Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s website vs complete copyright legislation | Patent Attorney Qualifications | Mylan and Actavis v… [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
More.As we said, it’s hard to keep up with all those Constitution Day talks. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 2:18 pm
In today’s case (Williams v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:14 pm
Sakkab v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:06 am
A 2010 California Supreme Court decision, Martinez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
Bill Crawford, the petitioner in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Bonilla initiated an Article 78 action seeking a court order compelling the Town of Hempstead to provide him with a defense and indemnification in an action entitled Smith v Town of Hempstead, CV-134985, pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York as mandated by the Town Code. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:50 am
Dissenting, Judge Fischer argued that the decision by “this trial court to exclude what amounted to days and days of such evidence” because the employee failed to exhaust his pattern and practice claim was not an abuse of discretion (Cox v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Four days later, Weatherspoon received an e-mail with an attached affidavit for her to sign concerning her conversation. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Four days later, Weatherspoon received an e-mail with an attached affidavit for her to sign concerning her conversation. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
In Adar v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
Smith (many thanks to him!) [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
The collection of historical CSLI does not invade a cell phone user’s reasonable expectation of privacy under the third-party doctrine of Smith v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
The collection of historical CSLI does not invade a cell phone user’s reasonable expectation of privacy under the third-party doctrine of Smith v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
These will prove really handy for anyone who was enjoying an autumn break or attending the MARQUES Conference in Vienna -- and for those readers who found themselves spending two whole days offline while greeting the Jewish New Year (oh, and a happy new year to all our readers, of whatever creed, colour or cuddliness!) [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm
Those other cases, including Smith v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
And the last time Labor Day gas prices were this low, George W. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:51 am
It is misleading if one thinks of metadata under Smith v Maryland (the court decision that says phone metadata has less privacy protection because it is information freely given to the phone company): there is no expectation that the network would record or even care about this information. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:45 am
Judge Smith filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (Alcantar v. [read post]
