Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 2001 - 2020 of 41,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2007, 4:32 pm
The Right to Remain Silent The Toronto Star published an editorial on R v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:42 pm by Dwight Sullivan
” Exhibit B is a letter to Ms. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am by CMS
CPR 62.18(8)(b) and CPR 6.44 (which deals with service of documents on a foreign state) require the order permitting the enforcement of the Award to be served. [read post]
5 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
North Carolina 16-1087 Issues: (1) Whether the burden of proof concerning the reasons for pretrial delay rests (a) with the state, to show that the reasons for delay were justified, as eleven circuits and many state courts of last resort have held; or (b) with the defendant, to show that the reasons for delay were unjustified, as the court below held; and (2) whether a defendant who was incarcerated during a nearly-nine-year pretrial delay must also produce… [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:44 pm by Sme
Roosevelt County Board of County Commissioners (10th Cir., July 12, 2017) (affirming magistrate's 12(b)(6) dismissal of Ellison's claim he was fired for arresting his supervisor's friend, reporting misconduct, and refusing to cover up wrongdoing:  his complaint failed to state a plausible claim for relief)Discrimination/Retaliation*Jara v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 8:30 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
This has included a $280 million settlement in United States of America ex rel Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:49 pm by Darrell Fields
Discussions and relevant cert. papers are available here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/diaz-v-united-states/ The petition for certiorari frames the “Question Presented” as follows: Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) provides: “In a criminual case, an expert witness must not state an opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition that constitutes an element of the crime charged or of a… [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:12 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Whitman v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
(b) as a result of the absence of such information, the offer for sale or sale of the unboxed products constitutes a criminal offence according to the law of the Member State of the Community in which they are offered for sale or sold by third parties? [read post]