Search for: "State v. Daniel" Results 2001 - 2020 of 5,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
For example, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner assert that the removal would be improper if it was done for improper motives: namely “personal, pecuniary, or purely partisan ends. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:49 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
En cuanto al mandato constitucional sobre fianza no excesiva, el informe positivo puntualiza e intenta adoptar lo resuelto en Hodgdon v United States, 365 F. 2d 679 (1966), que es un caso del Octavo Circuito que establece que una fianza no es inconstitucional sólo porque el imputado no puede prestarla por razón de falta de recursos. [read post]