Search for: "State v. Downes" Results 2001 - 2020 of 36,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 3:43 am
As its name suggests, BJ v MJ (Financial Remedy: Overseas Trusts) [2011] EWHC 2708 (Fam) deals with the issue of how trusts should be treated in the division of assets following divorce.The judgment was handed down by Mr Justice Mostyn on the 27th November. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm by Olivia Cross
  [6.18.2020] In what will likely be seen as a landmark decision for years to come, on Monday, June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down an opinion in the case Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:24 am by Matthew Perry, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court is due to hand down a decision tomorrow which will give clarification to the legal position regarding the ability of parties to seek final determination by litigation following adjudication. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
The Court of Appeal handed down its decision yesterday in Hospira v Genentech (with the first instance decision reported by this Kat here). [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm by INFORRM
Clearly more is required for a provider to acquire a sufficient state of knowledge to be deprived of the statutory protection” [60]. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
" This prohibition on federal courts enjoining state courts does not apply to Section 1983 suits because the Supreme Court has unequivocally held in Mitchum v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:26 pm by Mark Murakami
  As predicted, the United States just petitioned for Supreme Court review (petition here). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am by MBettman
” Justice Donnell, dissenting opinion On November 21, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:03 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 1 July 2021, the High Court handed down judgment in the long-running libel action of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Others [2021] EWHC 1797 (QB). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   In reaching this latter conclusoin, Judge Sullivan rejected the applicability of the 1928 Zeig v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:02 am by Paul Venard
The Supreme Court last year ruled in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:08 pm by lennyesq
 Reversing the determination that a New Jersey law repealing prohibitions on sports gambling violated the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, making it unlawful for a State or its subdivisions to sponsor, operate, advertise, promote, license, or authorize betting on sports because by permitting sports betting the State was authorizing sports betting under the statute as PASPA was held to violate the anticommandeering rule stating that Congress cannot… [read post]