Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 19,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
For example, in Matter of the Town of Callicoon, 79 NY2d 907, the Court of Appeals ruled that a court could vacate an arbitrator’s award if it determines that the award violated a strong public policy. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 10:52 am
Justice Brooke in Tomlyn v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:13 am
In May, we reported on the May 5, 2010 oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Minkler v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm
The petition of the day is: Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court has just finished hearing oral argument in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 9:20 pm
I've been mulling over the 53 pages of the Virginia Supreme Court's decision in Jaynes v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:13 am
Giuffre v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 9:21 am
Our Orange County employment lawyers understand here again, there is evidence to suggest the workers may have a strong case. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 4:57 am
There was a strong dissent written by Justice Sheldon A. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm
Perhaps most noteworthy is the extent to which the judges on the court appear to be in agreement on the relevant standard and its application: although the panel compositions for Old Reliable and iLor v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 7:24 am
Confusion was unlikely even though Lerner & Rowe’s mark was strong. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 1:34 am
The Supreme Court ruled yesterday in Lopez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:16 pm
The case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:16 am
Unlike R. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
The Judge concluded that “Mr Modi has singularly failed to provide any reliable evidence that Mr Cairns was involved in match fixing or spot fixing, or even that there were strong grounds for suspicion that he was” [118]. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 10:15 am
Nevertheless, the result in this case is inconsistent with the plain language of other published opinions, which makes a strong case for Supreme Court review. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:42 am
Four strong conservatives -- Judges O'Scannlain, Rymer, Bybee, and Randy Smith -- plus Judge Tallman (a reliably conservative Clinton appointee) and Judge Gould (Clinton). [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 1:52 pm
And yet, if the defendant's 70 or something, the case takes on a whole new meaning.My strong sense is that the former is true. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:21 am
I hope you’ll read the whole thing, but the upshot is: (1) the arguments for infringement and against a fair use defense are very strong and (2) raising fair use defenses in situations where it doesn’t belong hurts everyone. [read post]
