Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 2001 - 2020 of 4,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An arbitrator's award may only be vacated by a court if it violates public policy, is irrational or it exceeds specified limitations on the arbitrator's powerSubway Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Employee objected, contending that the collective bargaining agreement [CBA] between the Village and the Bronxville Police Taylor Act Committee [BPTC] provided that he was entitled to individual and family health insurance coverage as a disability retiree. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Taylor in order to “end the cycle of violence” on the reservation. . . . [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
If one goes back to see how Madison Cawthorn and Marjorie Taylor Greene handed the challenges to their eligibility back in 2022, it was a very different strategy. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:42 am by Bruce Nye
  In 2003, a California Appellate Court held that, even if the plaintiff cannot recover damages from the Navy, the Navy is an entity to whom the jury can allocate “fault” (Taylor v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:01 am
Compelling arbitration in cases where the grievance is based on the unilateral act or omission of a third partyRemsen CSD v Remsen Teachers Asso., 270 AD2d 796 [Decided with In re Mohawk Central School District, 270 AD2d 798]In Richfield Springs CSD v Allen, 270 AD2d 734, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the fact that a third party provides the employer’s negotiated fringe benefit does not insulate the employer from its duty to negotiate changes in the… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:48 pm
As set forth below the two dissenting Justices would have corrected the illegality by ordering the sentences to run concurrently:As noted by the majority, the sentence in this case was imposed pursuant to a plea agreement, but we have in the past modified a judgment on the ground that the bargained-for sentence was illegal because consecutive sentences were not permissible and have directed that the sentences run concurrently (see People v Taylor, 197 AD2d 858). [read post]