Search for: "Three S Consulting v. US"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 5,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2011, 5:47 am
” In the end, the three-member panel of the Divisional Court found that the minister did comply with the process mandated by the EBR when he prescribed a setback requirement of 550 metres: There was a full public consultation and a consideration of the views of interested parties. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
The consultation closes on 19 September 2018. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:30 am
Call 732.360.9300, or use the contact link on this page to request a consultation. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
The plaintiff appeals this ruling on all three grounds. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
Call now for a free consultation: 1-888-THE-DEFENSE (1-888-843-3333). [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 2:04 pm
The CNIL’s recommendations further elaborate on these criteria and provide examples of mechanisms that can be used to verify a person’s age online. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 6:54 am
” “Chief Judge Eduardo V. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:13 pm
See Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:46 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 7:00 am
The Fogelman Decision – NO Fogelman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
In the case of Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others, case C‑360/13,The Court of Justice of the European Union has held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, with PRCA director general Francis Ingham saying: "We are utterly delighted that the CJEU has accepted all of our arguments against the NLA". [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am
Although not directly concerned with “law and religion”, the consultation used a rudimentary methodology of assessment, included a number of churches with links to the slave trade and provided local opinion on the action which should be taken. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:24 am
In the Court’s own words: Not only did Dal–Tile fail to take any serious action for three years in spite of the long list of ongoing harassment by Koester, but particularly shocking to us is the fact Dal–Tile took absolutely no action when Koester passed gas on Freeman’s phone and made Freeman cry in Wrenn’s presence, nor when Freeman promptly complained to Wrenn that Koester had used the word… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:47 pm
Not in Farrey v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Stasik made it clear that he's not a lawyer, but he has extensive licensing experience (as a former Ericsson licensing director and, more recently, a consultant and expert witness). [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
In the case of Pinksterboer v Coumi [2018] SADC 25, the District Court awarded compensatory damages of Aus$42,500 in respect of three publications made in the context of an “escalating neighbour dispute”. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
