Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,second Circuit"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 10,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
Although the Ninth Circuit had accepted such an argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
The Court of Appeals strikes down the law under the Equal Protection Clause.The case is Dandamudi v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:28 pm
By Peter Montine The United States Supreme Court has made it easier for district courts to award attorney’s fees in frivolous patent infringement cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
Another chapter in the A-12 story has just been published by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, this McDonnell Douglas Corp. and General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:12 am
Via Scotusblog, he United States Supreme Court granted certiorari this morning in Arave v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 8:19 am
Allegedly, the defendant subsequently filed an appeal, raising three arguments: first, that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal, asserting that the State had not presented sufficient evidence of intent to commit an offense upon entry into the victim’s home; second, that he was entitled to a twelve-person jury under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution; and third,… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:45 pm
The third ban was issued by presidential proclamation six months after the second ban—and after several courts had enjoined the second ban. [read post]
28 May 2025, 5:01 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
(a) Did the Second Circuit err, as a threshold matter, in applying this Court's decision in Storer v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am
Today the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:32 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SECOND CIRCUITPETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANCPRELIMINARY STATEMENT Petitioner, Lawrence R. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm
United States, while the Court held that the property owner has the right to make a takings argument, the Court did NOT conclude that a taking had in fact occurred. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
Court of Appeals, Second Circuit [See WIMS 9/22/09]. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:00 am
Marcus’ appellate attorney caught the error and raised the issue before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:30 am
Rachel Malehorn / CC BY Over the weekend, President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett, United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, to fill the open Supreme Court seat. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Accordingly, the federal district court held that she failed to satisfy her burden of proving that she was entitled to a reasonable accommodation within the meaning of ADA.Such a ruling, said the United States Circuit Court, Second Circuit, was error, noting "A straightforward reading of the ADA confirms that an employee may qualify for a reasonable accommodation even if she can perform the essential functions of her job without the… [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Accordingly, the federal district court held that she failed to satisfy her burden of proving that she was entitled to a reasonable accommodation within the meaning of ADA.Such a ruling, said the United States Circuit Court, Second Circuit, was error, noting "A straightforward reading of the ADA confirms that an employee may qualify for a reasonable accommodation even if she can perform the essential functions of her job without the… [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 9:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 10:41 am
Given this daily act of caffeinated alchemy, it shouldn’t be any surprise that Starbucks plotted a similarly difficult course in having certain supervisory employees participate in tip pools in a recent set of class action cases before the New York Court of Appeals and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 2:45 pm
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit barred the state from enforcing the law, reasoning that the words “the people” in the Second Amendment “presumptively encompass all Americans, including 18-to-20-year-olds, and we are aware of no founding-era law that supports disarming people in that age group. [read post]
